Why Ketanji Brown Jackson accused the Supreme Court of playing ‘Calvinball’ for Trump

Date: Category:politics Views:1 Comment:0


The newspaper comic strip “Calvin and Hobbes” had a fictional game called “Calvinball,” the rules of which are made up and constantly changing. The only fixed rule is that you can’t play it the same way twice.

The game appeared in a Supreme Court opinion Thursday, when Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson accused her colleagues of “Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist.”

In a solo opinion on the Trump administration’s quest to cut National Institutes of Health research grants, she wrote that in the court’s version of Calvinball, “this Administration always wins.”

It’s a remarkable statement from a sitting Supreme Court justice — she was clear to specify “this” administration — and not the first time that she has struck out on her own to publicly address her colleagues in stark terms.

Jackson is one of three Democratic appointees on the court, along with six Republican appointees. This was the latest example of Obama appointees Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan declining to sign on to some of Jackson’s strongest language. (All three Democratic appointees joined Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion in the NIH matter, a case that produced a tangle of separate opinions, including Jackson’s.)

In her solo effort, Jackson described the NIH case as the “newest entry in the Court’s quest to make way for the Executive Branch.” She said it’s one that “has real consequences, for the law and for the public,” and she expressed the hope that “affected grant recipients can find a way to maintain their research studies — and their legal claims — long enough to give the Court the chance to change its mind.”

If the court changes course in the future and rules against the administration, that would seem to thwart Jackson’s Calvinball theory. But presumably she would be happy about that.

Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration’s legal cases.

This article was originally published on MSNBC.com

Comments

I want to comment

◎Welcome to participate in the discussion, please express your views and exchange your opinions here.